Hate

A reflection on how we weaponize words—and how we can choose better ones.

We speak of hate like it’s something out there, something owned by others, wielded by the worst of us. But it slips into our own mouths more often than we notice.
“I hate that guy.”
“They’re just evil.”
We say these things casually, even righteously, never stopping to ask what kind of seeds we’re planting when we do.

This isn’t a lecture. It’s a reflection. On the words we use. On the damage they can cause. And on the truth, that if we want peace, we can’t use the language of war to build it.

---

I heard it again the other day. That familiar phrase tossed out like lint, "I hate that guy."

No context, no conversation, just a flare of frustration and a hard edge of finality. And no one blinked. No one pushed back. We’ve grown used to that kind of speech. It slips through dinner tables, comment threads, and news segments as easily as a sigh.

But hate is never just a word. It’s a fire-starting whisper. And when we speak it casually, when we wield it like punctuation, we forget that it burns long after the sentence ends.

Somehow, we’ve convinced ourselves that to feel strongly means we must speak harshly. That outrage requires venom. That, to take a stand, we must flatten the one we oppose.

But I wonder… What does it say about us, not them, but us, when the words we use to define “wrong” begin to corrode the very values we claim to protect?

We say, “hate has no place here,” and then we use it as seasoning in our arguments. We say we want peace but fill our mouths with sharpened syllables.

Maybe it’s time we ask: What are we planting with our words? And who might be living in the fields we’ve scorched?

Hate doesn’t always arrive with a scream. Sometimes it rides quietly on a phrase, dressed in certainty, sharpened by frustration. And the problem isn’t just that we speak it, it’s that we believe we’re justified in doing so.

We tell ourselves it’s fine, because we’re the good ones. We hate injustice. We hate cruelty. We hate those who hate.

But that’s the trap, isn’t it?

Hate, even when aimed at something ugly, still spreads like seed on the wind.
And if we keep tossing it around, it won’t just root in the hearts of the people we aim it at. It will root in ours, too.

History has taught us, repeatedly, that no side holds a monopoly on righteousness.
And yet we speak of our adversaries as if they are less than human,
as if demonizing them somehow makes our cause more pure.

But it doesn’t. It only makes us forget that every “other” is still a person.
Still a soul. Still a thread in the same tapestry we claim to be protecting.

And what we say, how we say it, becomes the soil in which our world grows.

If we sow hate, we shouldn’t be surprised when what rises is shaped like vengeance instead of peace.

The Buddha didn’t need a social media account to know how dangerous words could be.

He spoke instead of Right Speech, not as a rule to follow, but as a way to liberate others from harm. A discipline not of silence, but of skillful truth.

Right Speech asks five things of us:

• Is it true?

• Is it helpful?

• Is it timely?

• Is it spoken with kindness?

• Is it spoken with compassion?

It sounds simple, almost quaint. But it’s anything but soft.

Because Right Speech isn’t passive. It doesn’t mean we avoid saying hard things. It means we say them with precision, with clarity, and with the intention to awaken, not destroy.

To say, “I disagree with this policy because it causes harm,” is not the same as saying, “That person is evil.” One opens a conversation. The other ends it before it begins.

Right Speech is how we carry truth without turning it into a weapon. It’s how we hold our values without using them to bludgeon others.

It is, in many ways, the art of resistance without cruelty. And right now, in this world, in this moment, it may be one of the most radical practices left.

It’s a myth that love and truth are enemies. That in order to speak honestly, we must abandon kindness. That in order to fight for justice, we must salt the earth behind our words.

But clarity doesn’t require cruelty.

We can name harm without branding the one who caused it as irredeemable.
We can oppose ideologies without dehumanizing their adherents. And we must, because if we lose the ability to see the human behind the belief, we’ll soon forget how to be human ourselves.

What if we said instead:

“I reject this behavior because it hurts others.”

“I oppose this idea because it fuels division.”

“I am afraid of what this policy will do to the vulnerable.”

These aren’t weak statements. They are precise. They are true. They leave room for the person across from us to change. And if change is what we really want, shouldn’t we leave the door open for it?

When we choose language that burns bridges, we're not just keeping our enemies out, we're keeping healing out, too.

Right Speech is not about being “nice.” It’s about choosing the words that create the conditions for transformation.

Because the goal isn’t to win arguments. It’s to win back each other.

There’s a reason the Buddha and Gandhi spoke so often of restraint, not to stifle passion, but to purify its aim.

Mahatma Gandhi wrote:

“Hate the sin and not the sinner is a precept which, though easy enough to understand, is rarely practiced, and that is why the poison of hatred spreads in the world... It is quite proper to resist and attack a system, but to resist and attack its author is tantamount to resisting and attacking oneself. For we are all tarred with the same brush, and are children of one and the same Creator... To slight a single human being is to slight those divine powers, and thus to harm not only that being but with him the whole world.”

That’s the medicine. Not silence. Not surrender. But a fierce love that refuses to destroy the one who wounds us.

We are not separate from those we criticize. We are not clean while they are dirty.
We are entangled, in karma, in consequence, in the echo chamber of this shared, trembling world.

If we call ourselves “the good ones,” let our words sound different. Let them bind, not break. Let them illuminate, not incinerate.

Because if hate truly has no home here, then neither should the language that waters its roots.

Let us speak with clarity. Let us resist with compassion. Let us correct with dignity.

Let us be the voice that builds what hatred can never touch.

---

We don’t have to speak softly to speak rightly. We don’t have to hide our convictions to avoid causing harm. But if we, who claim to be on the side of good, speak with the same venom as those we resist, what, in the end, have we protected?

Let our words be precise. Let them be kind. Let them build the kind of world we actually want to live in.

Because hate doesn’t need our help. But healing just might.

If this robe-wrapped resonance found a place in you, please consider supporting what I do:

💛 Buy me a tea
📬 Become a free or paid subscriber
🔗 Or share this with someone who might need it.

Every little act helps keep the robe open, the mesh humming, and this work unfolding.

If your new:

Start Here

And please visit my Official Home page at: The Entangularity Project

Stay entangled, my friend.
—The Bathrobe Guy

---